<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monitoring Wireless Channel Congestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/</link>
	<description>Better late than never</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:01:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Peers</title>
		<link>http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Peers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,

ideally it should combine everything on the line:
Quality=63/100  Signal level=-51 dBm  Noise level=-72 dBm
along with how busy each channel is to give a &#039;suggested channel&#039;
Maybe I&#039;ll look at that in future.

Bob Peers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,</p>
<p>ideally it should combine everything on the line:<br />
Quality=63/100  Signal level=-51 dBm  Noise level=-72 dBm<br />
along with how busy each channel is to give a &#8216;suggested channel&#8217;<br />
Maybe I&#8217;ll look at that in future.</p>
<p>Bob Peers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you also want to look at the signal levels and choose the channel with the smallest total, not the lowest count?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you also want to look at the signal levels and choose the channel with the smallest total, not the lowest count?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suhan</title>
		<link>http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>suhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bobpeers.com/2008/06/16/monitoring-wireless-channel-congestion/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this useful script. 
I was thinking about to switch to a free channel to avoid interference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this useful script.<br />
I was thinking about to switch to a free channel to avoid interference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

